19, 24, and elsewhere, in
substituting ?????µ???????„?µ?????? (?????'s word) for ?????µ??????¦?„?±??; in vv. 10, 11, etc.,
in substituting ??????±??????»?»?‰ for ??????±??????»?»?‰; and in v. 46, ???±???±?????‚ for
???????·???‚. In the canonical part of Daniel the substitution of ??????±??????»?»?‰ for
??????±??????»?»?‰ mostly holds good also so far as A is concerned (ii. 9,
16).[36] In v. 36, A has a transposition of a clause, and in v. 39
another of its changes of prepositions in composition, not easily
accounted for. Q (alone) has such changes in vv. 4, 32, 38. The above
are all changes from B. ?“ often agrees with A and Q, or both, but has
nothing of importance independently.
The genitive ?????…???±?????¬?‚ (instead of ?·?‚) occurs occasionally in all the
above MSS. (vv. 27, 28, 62; also in LXX, v. 30). _cf._ ???¬?????±?‚ in St.
John xi. I.
Two cursive MSS. (234 Moscow, S. Synod; 235 Rome, Vat.) consist of
Susanna only; but whether they are perfect, or only fragments, is not
clear. Holmes and Parsons give no particulars.
Pages:
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153