_ I. 21 (middle, ed. Potter,
Oxf. 1715), among a chain of historic events, to the closing scene in
this piece: ?„???„?µ ??????° ?????¬?????„?± ?”?±????????» ?µ??°?‚ ?»?¬???????? ?»?µ?????„?‰?? ???»?·???µ??¶?‚, ??‘?????
????????±?????????[83] ??????????????? ???µ??¦ ?„???±?†?µ??¶?‚, ??‘?????????±??–???‚ ??????±?????¶?µ?„?±??.
TERTULLIAN (?? 240). In _de Jejun._ VII. (end) reference is made to vv.
35--39; and in IX. the story is again mentioned. In _de Oratione_, 29,
he quotes vv. 33, 34, seemingly with full acceptance. In _de Idol._ XIX.
he says that "Daniel nec Belum nec draconem colere."
ORIGEN (?? 254). Besides the question dealt with in his controversy with
Julius Africanus, Origen in the Fragment of his _Strom_, bk. X. expounds
Bel. He also quotes it in his _Exhort, ad martyrium_, ?§ 33.
CYPRIAN (?? 258) in _ad Fortunatum_, 11, quotes v. 5, apparently
following a translation of the ?????, and not of ??'s, text. The same verse
is again quoted by him in _Ep._ lviii. 5 in exactly the same words. It
is curious that both passages are preceded, in the same sections, by a
quotation of Dan.
Pages:
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265